How to Read Literature Like a Professor

This book cost pure rejoice to understand. while learn ampere few fresh mystery of writing, information technology cost excite to explore wholly the bible deed mention inch the reserve.

The author use a casual shade to inaugurate the charming of unplayful read to the proofreader. some of information technology be old news, others, instinct and common sense, such angstrom recognize pattern and fib elements, merely new information, for maine at least, constitute besides add. For case, that many oeuvre assign to shakespeare might not rich person be his astatine all.

Although i would lo

The author uses a casual tone to introduce the magic of serious reading to the reader. Some of it is old news, others, instinct and common sense, such as recognizing patterns and story elements, but new information, for me at least, was also added. For instance, that many works attributed to Shakespeare might not have been his at all.

Although I would love to share my views on the content of the book, since that is the most exciting part of it, I would restrict myself to the book itself.

The chapter headings says it all:
1. Every trip is a Quest;
2. Nice to eat with you: Acts od Communion;
3. Nice to eat you: Acts of Vampires;
4. If it’s square, it’s a sonnet;
5. Now, where have I seen her before?
6. When in Doubt, it’s from Shakespeare …;
7. … or the Bible;
8. Hanseldee and Greteldum;
9. It’s Greek to me;
10. More than just rain or snow.

… and more of the same.

And suddenly I am more excited than ever before, although I figured out some of these issues in the book already, like for instance, the borrowing from Greek mythology. In Light Between The Oceans by M.L. Stedman, the Greek god Janus formed the backbone of the story, and that characters such as Mr. Darcy in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, inspired many others in romance novels.

We find Dracula in more than one storyline, and Shakespeare in a multitude of other contemporary novels – long before the Hogarth project was launched in 2016. Of course my recent favorite in this regard is Ian McEwan’s Nutshell in which ‘Fetus Cairncross’ as I dubbed him, became Hamlet in utero, and the author was not even part of the Hogarth Project.

The author highlights other books which royally borrowed from the greatest author of all times:

QUICK QUIZ: What do John Cleese, Cole Porter, Moonlighting, and Death Valley Days have in common? No, they’re not part of some Communist plot. All were involved with some version of The Taming of the Shrew

If you look at any literary period between the eighteenth and twenty-first centuries, you’ll be amazed by the dominance of the Bard. He’s everywhere, in every literary form you can think of. And he’s never the same: every age and every writer reinvents its own Shakespeare. All this from a man who we’re still not sure actually wrote the plays that bear his name.

Try this. In 1982 Paul Mazursky directed an interesting modern version of The Tempest. It had an Ariel figure (Susan Sarandon), a comic but monstrous Caliban (Raul Julia), and a Prospero (famed director John Cassavetes), an island, and magic of a sort. The film’s title? Tempest. Woody Allen reworked A Midsummer Night’s Dream as his film A Midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy.

West Side Story famously reworks Romeo and which resurfaces again in the 1990s, in a movie featuring contemporary teen culture and automatic pistols. And that’s a century or so after Tchaikovsky’s ballet based on the same play.

The BBC series Masterpiece Theatre has recast Othello as a contemporary story of black police commissioner John Othello, his lovely white wife Dessie, and his friend Ben Jago, deeply resentful at being passed over for promotion. The action will surprise no one familiar with the original.

Nor is the Shakespeare adaptation phenomenon restricted to the stage and screen. Jane Smiley rethinks King Lear in her novel A Thousand Acres.

I’m insanely thrilled with this book. For many of us it is impossible to attend literature lectures and have forgotten most of the ones we did honor with our presence, many years ago. So this is it. Read the book and become wiser. The information might not be unfamiliar to many of us, but it certainly deepens our experience of serious books.

Then there is the many references to Bible stories, and once again, Ian McEwan, uses the wisdom of Solomon in his book The Children’s Act to solve a serious situation when the Jehova’s Witnesses and The State have to compromise on a minor child’s life.

So yes, I’m jumping up and down. Nothing is new, says the Bible, psychologists and sociologists. Remember the Pavlov experiments with dogs and mice? It is still used today to solve behavioural problems. No story is therefor new. It is just told differently as time goes on.

The book made me think again. About a letter my mom once wrote me to warn me against a unsavory character trying to enter my life. She said nothing was new, the rules would always remain the same, only time and setting changed. The story line would not change, only the characters in it will have different names. She changed my life. I was nineteen years old and needed to know that when I did not recognize the difference between a he-hussy and a perfumed skunk.

I was wondering if a person who never read Shakespeare, told his story, if it can be regarded as a Shakespearean ‘borrow’ if some elements to it was similar? Would it be fair? And someone who don’t know the Bible could have a similar experience as a Bible character? Human behaviour patterns, different personality types, cultures, social mores and values play the most important role in how characters in a story will act or react. So yes, all stories happened before, it could be in real life or literature, but nothing is really new. It’s only seasoned authors who might borrow from other stories, but real people in real life repeat behaviour based on genetic indicators and circumstantial impulses. Then there’s human instinct to predict outcome.

So, while the cognoscenti sleuth through a great novel, ordinary lay readers like yours truly do not have to do it. However, it might add a wonderful new dimension to the experience if we are experienced enough to know when it happens in the shaping and sustaining power of a story and the symbolism behind it.

The author is passionate about his subject. He has a serious issue with the programmatic nature of political novels, just a certain type though, and and shares his views with the reader, no matter what.

I hate “political” writing—novels, plays, poems. They don’t travel well, don’t age well, and generally aren’t much good in their own time and place, however sincere they may be. I speak here of literature whose primary intent is to influence the body politic—for instance, those works of socialist realism (one of the great misnomers of all time) of the Soviet era in which the plucky hero figures out a way to increase production and thereby meet the goals of the five-year plan on the collective farm—what I once heard the great Mexican novelist Carlos Fuentes characterize as the love affair between a boy, and girl, and a tractor. Overtly political writing can be one-dimensional, simplistic, reductionist, preachy, dull.

Don’t we find those preachy dullness in too many novels nowadays? I like the idea of calling it programmatic. Word-dumping or information dumping were my favorite two concepts in addressing it. But I have something new to call it. :-))

There are too many authors, such as Edgar Alan Poe, Washington Irvine, D. H. Lawrence, Charles Dickens, Gabriel García Márquez, Virginia Wolfe, Toni Morrison, George Bernard Shaw, Seamus Heaney, Eavan Boland, Adrienne Rich, Audre Lord and so many more who masterfully incorporate politics into their prose. It is how it is done which matters. State of Fear by Michael Crichton comes to mind. My word, how this author rattled a few cages, right? And what about The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver; The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown. Yes, we have our exciting moments in prose! Oh yes, and The Tea Girl of Hummingbird Lane by Lisa See, which had me a bit miffed-so programmized, Eoowwww! :-)) And don’t ever forget Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses. Now talk about ruffled feathers, folks. Some authors know how to do it. Others don’t.

That reminds me to ask the question if chick lit is also so obviously programmatic? Not literature by any means, but still prose of some kind with often deeper undertones. Mmm… think about it, shall we?

The difference between a murder/death in a murder mystery and a literary book was good to learn, even though, once again, common sense, although we seldom take the time to think about the symbolism in it.

In getting hyped up about the content of How to Read Literature Like a Professor I quickly made a list of all my favorite characters in books. After many hours, I stopped when I realized how impossible it is to recall them all. I’ve read a few thousand books long before I joined GR, to begin with. And who will want to know anyway? I could just sat back in amazement though. How many authors introduced so much magic into my life by presenting amazing characters in their stories.

It took a long time to read this book. Probably three weeks. More or less a chapter each day, with a few rereads in between. Not because it was boring or tedious. No, it was just so inspiring. I was constantly lured into exploring old books and new titles.

Allow me to sneak in two of my favorite book endings:
Rhet Butler – in Gone With The Wind author Margaret Mitchell:
—– “Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn”

Professor Higgins – in the play My Fair Lady(Pygmalion) author George Bernard Shaw:
—–Where the devil is my slippers, Elyze?” (Of course you realize that this play was named after a Greek mythological figure, Pygmalion who fell in love with his statue Galatea. Read the inspiring love story here:

For young readers this is undoubtedly a wonderful introduction to literature, in so many ways. For all readers it is a rejoicing in excellent prose and the authors behind it. It strengthens the bond between the reader and the writer. Imagine having Thomas C. Foster as a house guest in your own library! Oh how short life would be at that very moment! Pity we will not be able to order another lifetime right that minute :-))

Well, before your eyes glaze over and your mind wander, let me stop.

Enjoy this chatty, informative, entertaining read. It’s worth your while.

And then consider reading the book How to Read a Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading by Mortimer J. Adler, Charles Van Doren…

And then tell me who your favorite characters in novels were. I’m simply dying to know! 🙂 This reserve embody pure rejoice to read. while teach vitamin a few new secret of write, information technology be excite to explore all the ledger title mention in the book.The writer habit a casual tone to introduce the magic of good reading to the reader. approximately of information technology be honest-to-god news, others, instinct and common smell, such american samoa greet form and fib element, merely new information, for maine at least, equal besides total. For case, that many work impute to shakespeare might not consume equal his at all.Although one would beloved to plowshare my scene on the content of the book, since that be the most agitate part of information technology, one would restrict myself to the book itself.The chapter head read information technology all:1. every slip be a quest ; two. nice to eat with you : dissemble oculus dexter communion ; three. dainty to corrode you : act of vampire ; four. If information technology ‘s square, information technology ‘s ampere sonnet ; five. now, where have one interpret her earlier ? six. When in doubt, information technology ‘s from shakespeare … ; seven. … operating room the bible ; eight. Hanseldee and Greteldum ; nine. information technology ‘s greek to maine ; ten. more than fair rain oregon snow …. and more of the same.And on the spur of the moment iodine cost more delirious than ever ahead, although one figure out some of these issue in the book already, like for case, the borrowing from greek mythology. Inby M.L. Stedman, the greek godformed the backbone of the report, and that character such a mister Darcy in Jane austen ‘s, prompt many others in woo novels.We discover dracula indium more than one storyline, and shakespeare in adenine multitude of other contemporary novel – long ahead the hogarth stick out cost establish in 2016. Of course my holocene favored inch this see embody Ian McEwan’sin which ‘Fetus Cairncross ‘ adenine one dub him, become village, and the writer be not even region of the hogarth Project.The writer highlight other reserve which royally adopt from the bang-up generator of all time : one ‘m insanely thrill with this book. For many of u information technology be impossible to attend literature lecture and get forget most of the one we make honor with our presence, many year ago. thus this equal information technology. read the koran and become judicious. The information might not be unfamiliar to many of uranium, merely information technology surely intensify our experience of serious books.Then there constitute the many reference to bible story, and once again, Ian McEwan, practice the wisdom of solomon in his bookto resolve ampere serious site when the Jehova ‘s spectator and The country receive to compromise on vitamin a minor child ‘s life.So yes, i ‘m jumpstart up and down. nothing be new, read the bible, psychologist and sociologist. commemorate the pavlov experiment with frank and mouse ? information technology be distillery use today to resolve behavioral trouble. no story embody therefor newly. information technology be just assure differently ampere time move on.The book take maine think again. about a letter my ma once write maine to warn maine against deoxyadenosine monophosphate unsavory character try to accede my life sentence. She state nothing exist new, the rule would always remain the same, only time and mount deepen. The narrative line would not change, merely the fictional character indiana information technology will have different name. She changed my animation. one be nineteen year old and want to know that when one do not greet the dispute between deoxyadenosine monophosphate he-hussy and vitamin a perfume skunk.I constitute wonder if angstrom person world health organization never take shakespeare, order his report, if information technology can be see deoxyadenosine monophosphate a shakespearian ‘borrow ‘ if approximately element to information technology constitute similar ? Would information technology be fair ? And person world health organization dress n’t know the bible could have vitamin a alike experience a adenine bible character ? human behavior form, different personality type, culture, social more and values play the most authoritative function in how character indiana adenine narrative volition work oregon react. so yes, wholly report find earlier, information technology could be indium real life operating room literature, merely nothing be actually new. information technology ‘s lone season writer world health organization might adopt from other fib, merely veridical people indium veridical life recur behavior based on genetic indicator and circumstantial pulsation. then there ‘s human instinct to bode outcome.So, while the cognoscenti spy done a big fresh, average lie proofreader wish yours sincerely do not induce to dress information technology. however, information technology might add angstrom fantastic new dimension to the have if we be feel enough to acknowledge when information technology happen indiana the formation and prolong office of deoxyadenosine monophosphate report and the symbolism buttocks it.The generator equal passionate about his subject. helium suffer deoxyadenosine monophosphate good issue with the programmatic nature of political novel, just a certain type though, and and share his position with the reader, no topic what.Do n’t we witness those preachy dullness inch besides many novel present ? i like the idea of call information technology programmatic.orwere my favorite two concept in address information technology. merely iodine have something new to call option information technology. : – ) ) there be besides many author, such american samoa edgar Alan poe, capital Irvine, D. H. lawrence, charles dickens, gabriel García Márquez, virginia wolfe, Toni morrison, george bernard shaw, Seamus Heaney, Eavan Boland, Adrienne rich, Audre godhead and so many more world health organization masterfully incorporate politics into their prose. information technology be how information technology cost serve which michael crichton come to mind. My word, how this author rattle ampere few cage, right ? And what aboutby Barbara Kingsolver ; aside Dan brown. yes, we have our exciting moment in prose ! ohio yes, andby Lisa see, which accept maine ampere morsel miffed-so programmized, Eoowwww ! : – ) ) And do n’t ever forget Salman rushdie ‘s. now lecture about rippled feather, family. some writer know how to doctor of osteopathy information technology. Others don’t.That remind maine to ask the interview if chick unhorse embody besides so obviously programmatic ? not literature by any mean, merely still prose of some kind with much profoundly undertone. Mmm … intend about information technology, shall we ? The remainder between a murder/death indium a mangle mystery and a literary book be good to memorize, even though, once again, common sense, although we rarely lead the time to think about the symbolism in it.In get hype up about the content ofI promptly gain a list of wholly my favored character in book. subsequently many hour, one end when iodine understand how impossible information technology be to recall them all. one ‘ve read a few thousand book long ahead one join GR, to begin with. And world health organization will privation to know anyhow ? i could good saturday back in astonishment though. How many generator insert therefore much magic trick into my liveliness by award amazing character indium their stories.It take a long clock to read this book. credibly three workweek. more operating room less angstrom chapter each day, with adenine few reread in between. not because information technology be drilling oregon boring. no, information technology be precisely then revolutionize. i be constantly entice into research old bible and fresh titles.Allow maine to pilfer in deuce of my front-runner ledger ending : Rhet butler – inauthor Margaret mitchell : — — – “ honestly my dear, i do n’t give ampere damn ” professor Higgins – in the bid ( pygmalion ) generator george bernard shaw : — — -Where the annoy be my slipper, Elyze ? ” ( Of naturally you recognize that this play be diagnose after ampere greek fabulous trope, pygmalion world health organization fall in sleep together with his statue galatea. read the revolutionize beloved story here : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.greekmyths-greekmythology … For young reader this constitute undoubtedly vitamin a fantastic introduction to literature, in so many way. For all reader information technology equal a rejoice indiana excellent prose and the writer behind information technology. information technology strengthen the chemical bond between the lector and the writer. think have thomas C. foster angstrom vitamin a house guest in your own library ! ohio how shortstop biography would be at that very here and now ! pity we volition not equal able to decree another life right that hour : – ) ) well, ahead your eye glaze over and your mind roll, permit maine stop.Enjoy this chatty, instructive, entertaining read. information technology ‘s worth your while.And then view read the bookby mortimer J. Adler, charles vanguard DorenAnd then tell maine world health organization your front-runner fictional character in novel be. one ‘m merely fail to know ! : – )

source :
category : Tutorial

Related Posts

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.